7 Best Clay Alternatives for Outreach Personalization (2026)

Looking for a Clay alternative? Compare 7 data enrichment and personalization tools that help you build personalized outreach without Clay's complexity or credit confusion.

By James Crawford
7 Best Clay Alternatives for Outreach Personalization (2026)

Clay is powerful. I've used it. The waterfall enrichment across 150+ data providers is genuinely impressive when you need to pull together fragmented B2B data.

But here's what I've learned after months of building workflows: Clay was built for ops teams with time to spare, not sales reps who need to send personalized outreach today.

The credit system gets expensive fast. The learning curve is steep. And after all that setup, you still need a separate tool to actually send your messages.

According to users on G2, common complaints include "credits vanishing too quickly," "confusing pricing where different actions consume varying amounts," and workflows that "took more time than they saved."

If you're looking for something simpler, here are 7 Clay alternatives worth considering in 2026.

TL;DR: Quick Comparison

ToolBest ForStarting PriceKey Differentiator
Apollo.ioAll-in-one B2B salesFree, then $49/moData + outreach in one platform
CognismEnterprise complianceCustom pricingGDPR-compliant, phone-verified data
Persana AIAI-powered automation$75/mo24/7 AI agents + intent signals
LushaLinkedIn prospectingFree, then $36/moChrome extension simplicity
ZoomInfoEnterprise data depthCustom pricing321M+ contacts, intent data
InstantlyHigh-volume cold email$30/moBuilt for sending at scale
personalize.marketingSocial profile personalizationFree tier + paidLinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok in one API

Why Teams Look for Clay Alternatives

After talking to dozens of teams who switched away from Clay, the same pain points come up repeatedly:

1. Credit-Based Pricing Gets Confusing

Clay charges credits for everything: enrichments, AI actions, integrations. Different actions consume different amounts. According to Saleshandy, "the credit-based pricing became a dealbreaker as it is unpredictable, and becomes expensive at scale."

You start a workflow thinking you have plenty of credits. Two days later, you're buying more.

2. Steep Learning Curve

Clay is essentially a programmable spreadsheet. That flexibility is powerful, but it means you need to understand formulas, API chains, and enrichment logic before you can do anything useful.

Cognism's analysis found that "setting up API integrations and managing data enrichment workflows can be challenging for new users."

3. No Built-In Outreach

This is the one that catches people off guard. Clay enriches data beautifully. But then you need to export that data to Instantly, Lemlist, or another tool to actually send messages.

For teams who just want to go from prospect list to personalized outreach, that extra step adds friction.

What to Look for in an Alternative

When evaluating Clay alternatives, focus on:

  • Data quality: How accurate are emails and phone numbers?
  • Pricing transparency: Can you predict costs before you start?
  • Ease of use: How fast can you go from signup to first outreach?
  • Outreach integration: Does it connect to (or include) sending tools?
  • Platform coverage: LinkedIn only, or also Instagram/TikTok for creator outreach?

The 7 Best Clay Alternatives

1. Apollo.io

Best for: All-in-one B2B prospecting and outreach

Apollo.io is what you get when you combine a contact database with a sales engagement platform. Instead of enriching data and then exporting it somewhere else, you build sequences and send emails directly from Apollo.

Key Features:

  • 275 million contacts from 73 million companies
  • Built-in email sequences and dialer
  • AI-powered workflow assistant
  • Intent data to identify active buyers
  • CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot)

Pricing:

  • Free: 60 mobile credits, 120 export credits/year
  • Basic: $49/month (900 mobile credits/year)
  • Professional: $79/month (1,200 mobile credits/year)
  • Organization: $119/month (2,400 mobile credits/year)

Pros:

  • All-in-one platform eliminates tool-switching
  • Generous free tier for testing
  • Cleaner interface than Clay
  • No per-enrichment credits for basic data

Cons:

  • Less flexible than Clay for custom workflows
  • Data quality varies by region
  • Mobile credits still limited on lower tiers

When to choose Apollo over Clay: You want prospecting, enrichment, and outreach in one platform without building complex workflows.

For a detailed Apollo comparison, see our Apollo alternatives guide.


2. Cognism

Best for: Enterprise teams needing compliant, phone-verified data

Cognism positions itself as the compliant alternative. Where Clay aggregates data from 150+ providers with varying quality, Cognism focuses on phone-verified contacts with built-in GDPR and CCPA compliance.

Key Features:

  • Diamond Data: Phone-verified mobile numbers
  • DNC screening across 14 countries
  • GDPR and CCPA compliant by design
  • Real-time CRM enrichment
  • Chrome extension for LinkedIn

Pricing:

Custom pricing based on team size. Expect enterprise-level costs, but with predictable per-seat pricing rather than credits.

Pros:

  • Phone verification means higher connect rates
  • Compliance built in, not bolted on
  • Predictable pricing for budgeting
  • Claims 80% improved connect rates vs. other providers

Cons:

  • Expensive for small teams
  • Less flexibility than Clay for custom enrichment
  • Primarily B2B focused

When to choose Cognism over Clay: You're an enterprise team where compliance matters and you need phone numbers that actually work.


3. Persana AI

Best for: Teams who want AI to handle research and outreach automatically

Persana AI takes a different approach. Instead of giving you a spreadsheet to build workflows, it deploys AI agents that research prospects, identify intent signals, and write personalized outreach automatically.

Key Features:

  • 75+ data providers in one platform
  • AI agents that run 24/7
  • 75+ live intent signals (funding, hiring, job changes)
  • Automated sequence building
  • Writes personalized emails in your brand voice

Pricing:

  • Starter: $75/month
  • Growth: $149/month
  • Pro: $399/month

Pros:

Cons:

  • Less control than Clay's manual approach
  • Newer platform, smaller community
  • AI output quality varies

When to choose Persana over Clay: You want AI to do the heavy lifting instead of building workflows yourself.


4. Lusha

Best for: Sales reps who live in LinkedIn

Lusha is the simplest option on this list. No complex workflows. No credit calculations. Just a Chrome extension that shows you contact info while you browse LinkedIn.

Key Features:

  • Chrome extension for LinkedIn and company sites
  • Direct dial phone numbers
  • Email sequences built in
  • CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach)
  • Team collaboration features

Pricing:

  • Free: 50 emails, 5 phones/month
  • Pro: $36/user/month (480 emails, 40 phones/year)
  • Premium: $59/user/month (960 emails, 80 phones/year)
  • Scale: Custom pricing

Pros:

  • Dead simple to use
  • Works where you already prospect (LinkedIn)
  • Predictable per-user pricing
  • No workflow building required

Cons:

  • Limited to LinkedIn and company sites
  • Less data depth than Clay
  • No custom enrichment logic

When to choose Lusha over Clay: You want to find emails and phones while browsing LinkedIn without leaving the page.


5. ZoomInfo

Best for: Enterprise teams needing the deepest B2B database

ZoomInfo is the 800-pound gorilla of B2B data. If Clay is a flexible toolkit, ZoomInfo is a comprehensive platform with more data than you'll ever need.

Key Features:

  • 321 million business profiles
  • 104 million company records
  • Intent data from web behavior
  • Conversation intelligence for call analysis
  • AI-generated email personalization

Pricing:

Custom pricing. Expect $15,000-$40,000+ per year depending on features and seats. This is enterprise software.

Pros:

  • Largest B2B database available
  • Intent data helps prioritize prospects
  • Conversation intelligence is unique
  • All-in-one platform for large teams

Cons:

  • Expensive for small teams
  • Complex platform with learning curve
  • Annual contracts, limited flexibility
  • Overkill for simple use cases

When to choose ZoomInfo over Clay: You're an enterprise team with budget for premium data and need features like intent signals and conversation intelligence.


6. Instantly

Best for: High-volume cold email campaigns

Instantly.ai doesn't try to be Clay. It focuses on one thing: sending cold emails at scale without landing in spam. The personalization features are simpler, but the sending infrastructure is battle-tested.

Key Features:

  • Unlimited email accounts
  • Email warmup included
  • Lead database with 160M+ contacts
  • AI personalization columns
  • Deliverability monitoring

Pricing:

  • Growth: $30/month (1,000 leads, 5,000 emails/month)
  • Hypergrowth: $77.6/month (25,000 leads, 100,000 emails/month)
  • Light Speed: $286.3/month (500,000 leads, unlimited emails)

Pros:

  • Built for volume sending
  • Email warmup included
  • Simple interface
  • Affordable for high-volume teams

Cons:

  • Personalization is basic compared to Clay
  • Less enrichment depth
  • Primarily email-focused

When to choose Instantly over Clay: You need to send thousands of emails per month and care more about deliverability than deep enrichment.

For adding AI personalization to Instantly campaigns, see our guide on integrating personalization APIs with cold email tools. For a full comparison of Instantly and its competitors, see our Instantly alternatives guide.


7. personalize.marketing

Best for: Social profile personalization across LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTok

personalize.marketing takes a different approach than traditional Clay alternatives. Instead of trying to be a comprehensive B2B data platform, it focuses specifically on personalizing outreach from social profiles.

Where Clay excels at B2B data enrichment (company info, job titles, technographics), personalize.marketing excels at turning someone's actual social content into personalized messages.

Key Features:

  • Multi-platform support: LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok
  • AI message generation (not just data extraction)
  • Brand fit scoring (1-10) for each prospect
  • Single API call for data + personalization
  • No-code integrations with Zapier, Make, n8n

Pricing: Free tier available. See pricing for all plans.

Pros:

  • Specializes in Instagram and TikTok
  • Generates full personalized messages, not just data
  • Simple API, no complex workflow building
  • Free tier to test before committing
  • Predictable credit usage (10 credits per message)

Cons:

  • Less B2B data depth than Clay or ZoomInfo
  • Best for social profile-based outreach, not company research
  • Newer platform

When to choose personalize.marketing over Clay: You're doing influencer outreach, creator partnerships, or any outreach where social profiles matter more than company data. Or you want personalization without building complex workflows.

For detailed integration patterns, see:


How to Choose the Right Clay Alternative

Your PriorityBest ChoiceWhy
All-in-one B2B platformApollo.ioData + sequences + sending in one tool
Enterprise complianceCognismPhone-verified, GDPR-ready
AI automationPersana AIAgents do the work for you
LinkedIn simplicityLushaChrome extension, no setup
Maximum B2B dataZoomInfo321M+ contacts, intent data
High-volume emailInstantlyBuilt for deliverability at scale
Social personalizationpersonalize.marketingLinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok in one API

Decision framework:

  1. If you need company data + technographics: Apollo, Cognism, or ZoomInfo
  2. If you need phone-verified numbers: Cognism
  3. If you want AI to write messages: Persana AI or personalize.marketing
  4. If you do influencer/creator outreach: personalize.marketing
  5. If you just need to send more emails: Instantly
  6. If you want the simplest possible solution: Lusha

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Clay worth it?

Clay is worth it if you have an ops person who can dedicate time to building and maintaining workflows. The flexibility is unmatched. But for most sales teams who just want to personalize outreach, simpler alternatives get the job done faster.

What's the best free Clay alternative?

Apollo.io has the most generous free tier for B2B data (60 mobile credits, 120 exports). For social profile personalization, personalize.marketing offers 200 free credits monthly.

Can I use Clay with other outreach tools?

Yes. Clay is designed to enrich data that you then export to tools like Instantly, Lemlist, or HeyReach. But this is also the main complaint: you need multiple tools to complete the workflow.

Which alternative is best for influencer outreach?

personalize.marketing specializes in Instagram and TikTok alongside LinkedIn. Traditional Clay alternatives focus on B2B data (emails, phones, company info) rather than social content.

How do credits work across these tools?

It varies significantly:

ToolCredit Model
ClayPer action (varies by type)
ApolloPer export/mobile number
CognismPer seat (unlimited usage)
LushaPer contact revealed
personalize.marketingPer personalized message (flat 10 credits)

The most predictable models are per-seat (Cognism) or flat-rate per action (personalize.marketing).

Conclusion

Clay is powerful but complex. If you have the time and technical resources to build custom workflows, it remains one of the most flexible options available.

But most teams don't need that flexibility. They need to:

  1. Find prospects
  2. Get their contact info
  3. Write personalized messages
  4. Send outreach

For that workflow, simpler alternatives often work better:

  • B2B sales teams: Start with Apollo.io for the all-in-one approach
  • Enterprise with compliance needs: Cognism for phone-verified, GDPR-ready data
  • High-volume cold email: Instantly for deliverability at scale
  • Influencer and creator outreach: personalize.marketing for social profile personalization

Each tool solves a different problem. Pick the one that matches your actual workflow, not the one with the most features.

Ready to try social profile personalization? personalize.marketing offers 200 free credits to test personalized outreach on LinkedIn, Instagram, and TikTok. No credit card required.

For more on building personalized outreach at scale, see our Personalization API guide or browse the API documentation.